From an article on Fast Company
Lie: "People are our most important asset."
Truth: "People are our most worrisome and unpredictable asset. Our most important assets are really our financial assets."
How is this true? A pile of capital – so what does it do? Really, I’d like to know about this autonomous manifestation. If true, I could retire today. While I agree, people are our most worrisome and unpredictable asset, they are no doubt the most IMPORTANT asset.
Read the rest of this entry »
We at OG Consulting have been saying this for years. Frankly, we are the laziest and dumbest consultants around.
Why Good Programmers Are Lazy and Dumb by Philipp Lenssen
I realized that, paradoxically enough, good programmers need to be both lazy and dumb.
Lazy, because only lazy programmers will want to write the kind of tools that might replace them in the end. Lazy, because only a lazy programmer will avoid writing monotonous, repetitive code – thus avoiding redundancy, the enemy of software maintenance and flexible refactoring. Mostly, the tools and processes that come out of this endeavor fired by laziness will speed up the production.
Of course, we work very hard at being lazy. We’ll find resources you might not have thought of (because we’re lazy). We might write a business automation system (because punching numbers is boring and computers are good at it… and we’re lazy). We might help you better program your employees because we don’t want to do their work and neither do you. And we will ask the dumb questions you might not. In short, we don’t assume we know more than you do about your business. In consulting there is no shortage of professionals who help you spend your hard earned money to complicate your processes, accounting, Internet strategy, or software implementation.
We’ll probably lose our membership in the Secret Order of Consulting Professionals for saying this, but we don’t suppose it’s any secret – consultants obfuscate things to render the illusion of success or progress while billing by the hour. OG Consulting is neither motivated enough nor smart enough to pull that off. We’d rather help you make your business processes brain-dead simple so we don’t have to think so hard and neither will you.
And that’s the bottom line. We’re too lazy and dumb to fail.
Free/Libre Open Source Software has been criticized for undermining the pricing of software. This interesting piece published in ONLamp, exposes the true financial underbelly of the software market. We find out, that software really wasn’t worth much to begin with.
except from "Calculating the True Price of Software" by Robert Lefkowitz
… the major difference in worldview between open source advocates
and proprietary software license advocates is explainable as a differing
opinion on the correct value of the volatility of maintenance and upgrade
pricing. People who believe that the pricing on maintenance is stable and
unlikely to change see greater intrinsic value in the software. People who
fear that the pricing is subject to large fluctuations see no intrinsic value
in the up-front license; stripped of the options, the license value approaches
$0.
For the open source movement, perhaps a better way to position the change
that OSS is making is this: we’re converting warrants on future maintenance and
enhancements into options, which means that instead of having a sole supplier
(warrants), we have created a third-party market (options) of these
derivatives.
How capitalistic is that?
The conclusion is that even without all the financial analysis, Free/Libre Open Source programmers have stumbled upon an inevitable truth; software by itself isn’t worth much and the proprietary vendors know it. What has flourished in recent years is a free flowing market where vendors may compete to sell customers maintenance, support, and upgrades.